In mathematics, a measure-preserving dynamical system is an object of study in the abstract formulation of dynamical systems, and ergodic theory in particular.
Contents |
A measure-preserving dynamical system is defined as a probability space and a measure-preserving transformation on it. In more detail, it is a system
with the following structure:
This definition can be generalized to the case in which is not a single transformation that is iterated to give the dynamics of the system, but instead is a monoid (or even a group) of transformations parametrized by (or , or , or ), where each transformation satisfies the same requirements as above. In particular, the transformations obey the rules
The earlier, simpler case fits into this framework by defining for .
The existence of invariant measures for certain maps and Markov processes is established by the Krylov–Bogolyubov theorem.
Examples include:
The concept of a homomorphism and an isomorphism may be defined.
Consider two dynamical systems and . Then a mapping
is a homomorphism of dynamical systems if it satisfies the following three properties:
The system is then called a factor of .
The map φ is an isomorphism of dynamical systems if, in addition, there exists another mapping
that is also a homomorphism, which satisfies
A point is called a generic point if the orbit of the point is distributed uniformly according to the measure.
Consider a dynamical system , and let Q = { Q1, ..., Qk } be a partition of X into k measurable pair-wise disjoint pieces. Given a point x ∈ X, clearly x belongs to only one of the Qi. Similarly, the iterated point T nx can belong to only one of the parts as well. The symbolic name of x, with regards to the partition Q, is the sequence of integers {an} such that
The set of symbolic names with respect to a partition is called the symbolic dynamics of the dynamical system. A partition Q is called a generator or generating partition if μ-almost every point x has a unique symbolic name.
Given a partition Q = { Q1, ..., Qk } and a dynamical system , we define T-pullback of Q as
Further, given two partitions Q = { Q1, ..., Qk } and R = { R1, ..., Rm }, we define their refinement as
With these two constructs we may define refinement of an iterated pullback
which plays crucial role in the construction of the measure-theoretic entropy of a dynamical system.
The entropy of a partition Q is defined as
The measure-theoretic entropy of a dynamical system with respect to a partition Q = { Q1, ..., Qk } is then defined as
Finally, the Kolmogorov–Sinai or measure-theoretic entropy of a dynamical system is defined as
where the supremum is taken over all finite measurable partitions. A theorem of Yakov G. Sinai in 1959 shows that the supremum is actually obtained on partitions that are generators. Thus, for example, the entropy of the Bernoulli process is log 2, since every real number has a unique binary expansion. That is, one may partition the unit interval into the intervals [0, 1/2) and [1/2, 1]. Every real number x is either less than 1/2 or not; and likewise so is the fractional part of 2nx.
If the space X is compact and endowed with a topology, or is a metric space, then the topological entropy may also be defined.